Racial gaps pt. 2.

Progress in the quest for better information: a UCLA professor advises me that about 85% of UCLA grads overall take the California bar exam. So out of 18 African-American students, we'd expect 15 to sit for the Calif bar.

However, he also pointed out that at least a few students listed in the class of 2006 may still have one semester to go (because they took time off) and are not eligible to take the bar until February. So that may cut into the 18.

So today, I'll extend my unscientific sampling technique to white students listed in the class of 2006. While this number won't mean much in absolute terms, it will have been derived the same way as the African-American pass rate, making it more of an apples-to-apples comparison.

I started at the beginning of the facebook listings and took the first 30 students who were likely to be white. Since there's no correlation between the alphabet and academic performance, the first 30 would be as random as any 30. As before, I ran the names through the bar passage search engine.

23 out of 30 of the white students came up on the pass list = 76% pass rate. This number was derived the same way as the 44% number in the African-American sample: by taking the names on the pass list and dividing it by total names in the sample.

If we assume the overall UCLA pass rate is still around 89%, we can make a couple further inferences. Since 23 of the white students passed, probably 26 students in the sample sat for the exam, because 23 out of 26 = 88% pass rate. That would leave 4 who didn't take the exam for whatever reason. 4 out of 30 = 13%, which corresponds pretty well to the professor's estimate of how many UCLA grads take the Calif bar (85% do, which means 15% don't).

So going back to the African-American sample, let's use the same baseline and assume 85% took the bar, and 15% didn't. That means of the 18 students, 15 took the bar and 3 didn't. 8 out of 15 = 53% pass rate. (That's a more reliable baseline estimate than the previous 44%.)

Let's also have a more conservative hypothesis where, for whatever reason, only 70% of the African-American students took the bar. That would mean 12 out of 18 took it and 6 didn't. 8 passed out of 12 = 67% pass rate.

So, after this extra facebook experimenting, we can narrow the predicted bar pass range for African-American students to 53-67%. Compared to the white pass rate of 89%, there's still a gap of 22-36 percentage points. So it looks like UCLA tracks the statewide racial gap of 30 points pretty closely.

21 Nov 06

Comments

"If we assume the overall UCLA pass rate is still around 89%, we can make a couple further inferences. Since 23 of the white students passed, probably 26 students in the sample sat for the exam, because 23 out of 26 = 88% pass rate. That would leave 4 who didn't take the exam for whatever reason. 4 out of 30 = 13%, which corresponds pretty well to the professor's estimate of how many UCLA grads take the Calif bar (85% do, which means 15% don't)."

You're still making assumptions that the overall school averages for students of all ethnicities not taking the bar matches the percentage of whites. How convenient that the 26 students taking the bar number results in a 4 students not taking the bar, which even more conveniently matches tracks close to the 15% figure of all students? Nice job... Just because a UCLA advises you that 15% of UCLA grads do not take the CA bar does not make the true. Nor does that take into account the possibility that the racial breakdown of non-CA bar test takers that may drastically, thus skewing the pass rates that you've computed.

Posted by: at November 21, 2006 11:29 PM

That's incorrect. I'm assuming that the percentage of African-American students at UCLA not taking the CA bar is somewhere between 15% (the same as the overall student body) and 30% (double that rate, to account for unobservable differences in bar taking between groups).

Look at it another way. Suppose that there is no gap in bar passage rates. Since there were 8 African-Americans who passed, that means only 9 could've taken the bar (8 out of 9 = 89% pass rate). So the other 9 (or 50% of the total) didn't take the Calif bar. Possible, but not probable.

This analysis is predicated on best available information. Again, I would be delighted to find out there is no bar passage gap at UCLA. Anyone who has better information than me is welcome to post it and I will adjust the numbers accordingly.

Posted by: MB at November 22, 2006 08:41 AM
matthewb @ ucla
For Superfans Only
Click here to see the whole damn blog on one page

Recent Drivel
Home page
Epilogue 7: Recessionaires cont'd
Epilogue 6: Schill quits UCLA
Epilogue 5: recessionaires
Okay, I lied. Epilogue 4
Epilogue 3: The End (really)
Epilogue 2: Nov 2007
Epilogue
The eagle has landed
Seduced by the dark side
You've been in law school too long when...
Diplomas
I have only five more class days
The lone gunman
The last spring break is over
Someone saved your life tonight
Best advice
Alumni donations
Dean Schill & the Pussymobile
Help me yet again
Grant Nelson comes out of the closet
I approve
Buffalo Wings
Wall St Journal Law Blog
Matthew Black Orchestra
Search

How time flies
July 2010
September 2009
July 2009
September 2008
June 2008
November 2007
July 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
RSS Feed
right here buddy