ĄSoy un parador!.

In addition to "UCLA Law Review - rejected candidate" I can now add to my resume "UCLA Moot Court Honors Program - quitter". I had polish, but now I've got shine.

I signed up for Moot Court last week. I actually thought it sounded fun, compared to the law review write-on -- you know, show up in a fake court, wear a suit, do some fake oral argument.

I guess I was hoping that we would be 'mooting', oh I don't know, a personal injury case or something. Car accident. Dog bite. Something salt-of-the-earth.

What I forgot to figure in was -- law students. Would law students actually do moot court around a dog bite? Oh for gods sake no. What was I thinking?

The first surprise was that we had to do a large written brief. Yeah, I guess that's part of going to court. The Supreme Court, anyways. The court an appellate lawyer is least likely to find herself in during her career. Well OK, I can deal.

Then I ended up with a constitutional issue. That's cool. But then I looked more closely and realized that I wasn't being asked to argue the constitutional violation inside my client's case, I was being asked to argue a large and abstract constitutional law proposition. WTF?!

Wait it's those pesky law students again! Look I don't know about you ... and god bless the people who make it through moot court ... but I can't think of anything more boring than arguing large issues of constitutional law. Because it's vague, it's shapeless, the caselaw is blowin' in the wind, and the outcomes almost always come down to the predictable political moods of the justices.

But the law review write-on six months ago was a huge constitutional law question too. And it was the year before. Why are all these student-run competitions based on con law?

Perhaps because con law serves the same purpose in student competitions as thunderstorms do in movies. It adds drama. It makes you think something important is going on when it's not. It's ok to speak or write in a windy, pompous way about con law in a way that you can't speak or write about, say, contracts.

Moot court about a contract dispute! That would be terrific.

But, it won't happen. And I suppose they have a point. If you're going to have a fake baseball game, do you pretend you're on a minor-league team in Chattanooga, TN or playing the All-Star game?

After reading the research materials this afternoon I realized that moot court is really Grueling Write-On Competition Part II. After that it took me about 5 seconds to email in my resignation.

09 Oct 05

Comments
matthewb @ ucla
For Superfans Only
Click here to see the whole damn blog on one page

Recent Drivel
Home page
Epilogue 7: Recessionaires cont'd
Epilogue 6: Schill quits UCLA
Epilogue 5: recessionaires
Okay, I lied. Epilogue 4
Epilogue 3: The End (really)
Epilogue 2: Nov 2007
Epilogue
The eagle has landed
Seduced by the dark side
You've been in law school too long when...
Diplomas
I have only five more class days
The lone gunman
The last spring break is over
Someone saved your life tonight
Best advice
Alumni donations
Dean Schill & the Pussymobile
Help me yet again
Grant Nelson comes out of the closet
I approve
Buffalo Wings
Wall St Journal Law Blog
Matthew Black Orchestra
Search

How time flies
July 2010
September 2009
July 2009
September 2008
June 2008
November 2007
July 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
RSS Feed
right here buddy