This school-wide email takes the cake so far for misdirected outpouring of compensatory sympathy. What I like about it is a) its presumption that one person's bad judgment (leaving her bag unattended) is cause for community spirit and b) it sounds like a George W Bush speech. Just substitute "war on terror" for "laptop" and "country" for "community".
What sets UCLAw apart from many other law schools is the community that exists here, the way we care about one another. So when there is a violation against one member of our community, it is an affront to us all. Last Tuesday afternoon, a bag containing a laptop computer was stolen from a busy hallway in our law school. The victim of this cowardly act was [careless student]. We recognize that when any one of us suffers, we as a whole are diminished. So we have decided to take action. Not against the thief, whose reprehensible deed has already been done, but in solidarity with our fellow law student. We refuse to let one person bear the burden of this assault on our community alone. As individuals in community, we choose to act for good. On our part, it would take just one dollar, an inconsequential sum, but when multiplied across our law school community it could counter the significant loss that she has suffered. Evil need not prevail, we can act with just one dollar, and goodness can win the day.
03 Feb 05
Worst of all, this person managed to raise like $500 this way.
Posted by: MB at May 14, 2005 11:45 AMI would like all of my classmates to donate one dollar to me as well. I carelessly made C's last semester, and as a result my BIGLAW position was stolen by someone else.
Posted by: Poor Me at May 16, 2005 10:28 AM180 for the previous poster.
Posted by: 180 at May 16, 2005 11:06 AMIt sounds more like a Kerry speech - let's redistribute wealth! Woopee!
Posted by: EMD at May 16, 2005 12:20 PMI find this a sign of immaturity and stupidity. When I was in law school (at a prestige school in the Bay Area) this would never had happened. We all had enough money that we did not have to beg for more from our fellow students. You should all be ashamed.
Posted by: LawProf at May 16, 2005 06:19 PMWe all know who you are. Your law school reference gave you away. And your as big an asshole now as you were when you were a law student!
Posted by: MS at May 16, 2005 07:59 PMFirst of all, the loss of the laptop was not an act of carelessness by the owner. The computer was not left "unattended", but stolen right out from where the owner was standing in the hallway (in broad daylight, while classes where getting out, no less). This makes this particularly act of theivery all the more egregious. I agree that someone who leaves their laptop unattended in the library or a classroom has no right to complain when it disappears, but that just wasn't the case in this instance.
Second, it should be noted that the UCLA student whose laptop was stolen happens to be one of the most kind, caring, considerate (and as a result, one of the most popular) students in the 2L class. This student has committed many hours of service to making UCLAW a better school for us all. Had this laptop theft happened to some insignificant careless schmuck at the law school (of which there are plenty), I doubt there would've been an effort to raise funds, and there certainly would not have been such an outpouring of support. (I, for one, gave $5 to the fund).
Post-Script: BTW, the student in question did not hoard all the money that was raised, but instead shared it with similar students who had gotten their laptops stolen throughout the year. I wouldn't be so quick to judge someone you obviously don't know, especially when you can't even get your facts straight. I just hope next time you catch a run of bad luck, the solidarity and gracious demeanor of the UCLA student body is still alive and well enough to help you in your plight, and hasn't been diminished by your witless banter.
Posted by: DSP at May 16, 2005 09:33 PM"We all had enough money that we did not have to beg for more from our fellow students."
Thanks for the elitist memoir. And on to the laptop... I agree with earlier poster who brings up the valid point that we have no idea what the circumstances were regarding the theft.
Posted by: SK at May 17, 2005 09:22 AMRegardless of its physical proximity, it was obviously "unattended" enough to be stolen unnoticed.
In the course of a school year, a lot of students have to endure difficulties a lot more severe than the loss of a totally replaceable piece of machinery. These people are not sending out melodramatic school-wide emails demanding compensation. It's tacky and childish.
Posted by: MB at May 17, 2005 11:32 AMMB, what you say is true. However, i think the success of the stolen-laptop fund, marked by the student body's response to one student's cry for help (however tacky or inappropriate) speaks a great deal to the school's character. Instead of using this act as a point of ridicule, the success of the drive should instead stand out as a testament to the type of collegiality and commraderie among UCLA students that is not often found at "prestige schools in the Bay Area" or elsewhere.
Posted by: riddance at May 17, 2005 03:38 PMMB, the letter sounds like it was sent out on someone's behalf, so the individual in question isn't the one making the plea. It's also not a "demand" for "compensation." If you don't want to donate a dollar, don't. But your criticism is totally unfounded.
Posted by: CB at June 29, 2005 02:31 PM